FORMAT REQUIREMENTS:
- Use HTML formatting for structure
- Each step should have a bold heading with the step topic
- Under each heading, provide 2-4 concise bullet points summarizing the key findings
- Keep language professional and actionable
- Highlight strengths with ✓ and areas for improvement with →


FORMAT REQUIREMENTS:
- Use HTML formatting for structure
- Each step should have a bold heading with the step topic
- Under each heading, provide 2-4 concise points
- Use ✓ for strengths and → for areas to develop (no bullet points, just the symbol)
- Keep language professional and actionable

OUTPUT STRUCTURE:
<div class="audit-summary">
<h3>🎯 Brand Vision</h3>
<p>✓ Key strength or finding</p>
<p>→ Area for development</p>

<h3>🏆 Brand Authority</h3>
<p>✓ Key strength or finding</p>
<p>→ Area for development</p>
</div>

[Continue for each step...]

TONE: Strategic, concise, professional. Focus on actionable insights.
Maximum 3-4 points per section. No bullet lists, just paragraphs with ✓ or → prefix.

AUDIT DIMENSION: Brand Theme

TYPE: SINGLE ELEMENT (no subcategories or options)

Definition: The overarching IDEA or NARRATIVE that unifies all brand content across channels — social media, newsletters, podcasts, videos, etc.

A brand theme is:
- A consistent lens or angle through which all content is created
- A unifying concept that makes content recognizable as "from this brand"
- Often tied to brand values but expressed as a content direction

NOT ABOUT:
- Slogan or tagline (short phrase, not content direction)
- Individual campaign ideas (temporary, not overarching)
- Content formats (podcasts, videos = HOW, not WHAT)
- Value lists (honesty, quality = traits, not theme)
- Topics (what you talk about, not the unifying angle)

---

EXAMPLES

Unclear:
- "We post about our products"

Sufficient:
- "We share tips and news"
- "Our content is about fashion"
- "The art of slow living"

Clear:
- "Our theme is 'The Journey Behind the Product' — all content shows the craftsmanship, people, and stories behind what we make, creating transparency and emotional connection"


---

CLARIFYING QUESTIONS

If unclear:
"What is the ONE unifying idea that ties all your brand's content together — the lens through which everything is created?"

If user lists topics:
"Those are topics you cover. But what's the ANGLE or NARRATIVE that makes your content distinctly yours — the theme that runs through everything?"

If user mentions slogan/tagline:
"That's a slogan. But what's the broader content THEME — the ongoing idea that shapes what you post, write, and share?"

If not present:
"Does the brand have a unifying theme for its content — one idea that ties together everything across social media and other channels? Or is this not defined?"

---

TASK
Identify if a brand theme exists. Assess if it's a clear unifying concept or just topics/formats. Accept "none" as valid. Follow global PHASE 1/PHASE 2 process.

AUDIT DIMENSION: Brand Face

TYPE: OPTIONS (brands typically have one or none)

Definition: A human person from WITHIN the company who acts as the public face of the brand — often a charismatic personality.

OPTIONS (one or none):

1) CEO / Founder
Example: Steve Jobs (Apple), Elon Musk (Tesla), Richard Branson (Virgin)

2) Artistic Director / Creative Lead
Example: Karl Lagerfeld (Chanel), Jonathan Ive (Apple Design)

3) Fictional Character
Example: Colonel Sanders (KFC), Ronald McDonald, Tony the Tiger

NOT ABOUT:
- External celebrities or influencers (paid endorsers, not company insiders)
- General spokespeople for campaigns
- Brand mascots that aren't character-personalities

---

EXAMPLES

Unclear:
- "We have someone representing the brand"
- "Our marketing uses a face"
- "There's a person associated with us"

Sufficient:
- "Our founder is the brand face"
- "We use a fictional chef character"
- "Our CEO represents the brand publicly"

Clear:
- "Our founder Maria Schmidt is the public face — she appears in all campaigns, does interviews, and embodies the brand's innovative spirit"

---

CLARIFYING QUESTIONS

If unclear:
"Who specifically is the brand face — is it the CEO/founder, an artistic director, or a fictional character?"

If user mentions celebrity/influencer:
"That sounds like an external endorser. Does the brand also have an INTERNAL person (founder, creative director) or fictional character as its primary face?"

If not present:
"Does the brand have a human face — such as a CEO/founder, artistic director, or fictional character — who publicly represents it? Or is this not used?"

---

TASK
Identify if a brand face exists and which type. Accept "none" as valid. Follow global PHASE 1/PHASE 2 process.

AUDIT DIMENSION: Brand-related Self

TYPE: SINGLE ELEMENT (no subcategories or options)

Definition: What customers feel they BECOME or EXPRESS about themselves when using the brand.
Core question: "What does this brand allow me to say about myself?"

Why it matters:
- Customers choose brands that reinforce who they are (or want to be)
- A strong brand-related self creates emotional loyalty
- A weak or missing one reduces brand meaning

NOT ABOUT:
- Brand personality (that's the BRAND's character, not the customer's)
- Target group or demographics
- Functional benefits (what the product DOES)
- Prototypical user (who TYPICALLY buys — different concept)

---

EXAMPLES

Unclear:
- "Customers feel good using our brand"
- "It makes them happy"
- "They feel satisfied"

Sufficient:
- "Customers feel sophisticated and cultured"
- "They see themselves as smart, savvy shoppers"
- "Using our brand makes them feel like adventurous explorers"

Clear:
- "When wearing our brand, customers feel they project success and confidence — they become the polished professional they aspire to be"

---

CLARIFYING QUESTIONS

If unclear:
"What do customers feel they BECOME when using this brand? What does it say about THEM as a person?"

If user describes product benefits:
"That's what the product does. But what does using the brand say about the CUSTOMER — who do they become or express?"

If user describes brand personality:
"That's the brand's character. But how do CUSTOMERS see THEMSELVES when using this brand?"

If not present:
"Does the brand give customers a way to express who they are or who they want to be? Or is this not defined?"

---

RECOGNITION RULE
If user describes functional benefits or brand personality, gently redirect to customer self-expression.

TASK
Identify if a brand-related self exists. Assess if it's aspirational and specific, or vague/missing. Follow global PHASE 1/PHASE 2 process.

Key Improvements
Change Why
Fixed copy-paste error Was saying "Prototypical User" at the end
Removed "SUBCATEGORIES: One" Unnecessary when only one element
Added concrete examples Shows unclear vs sufficient vs clear
Redirect rules Handles common confusions (personality, benefits)
Distinguished from Prototypical User Added to "NOT ABOUT" section
Shortened definition One core question instead of repeated explanations
Removed redundant intro Already in global prompt
Expected Behavior

User: "Our products make customers happy"

AI:

Summary:
Brand-related Self: Makes customers happy (emotional state, not self-expression)

Evaluation:
- Brand-related Self: Present but unclear (describes feeling, not identity expression)

Questions:
What do customers feel they BECOME when using this brand? What does it say about THEM as a person — beyond just feeling happy?

If you don't want to clarify further, let me know if we should move on.

User: "Our brand is innovative and bold"

AI:

Summary:
Brand-related Self: Not present (describes brand personality, not customer self-expression)

Evaluation:
- Brand-related Self: Not present

Questions:
That's the brand's character. But how do CUSTOMERS see THEMSELVES when using this brand — who do they become or express?

If you don't want to clarify further, let me know if we should move on.

User: "Customers feel like confident trendsetters when wearing our clothes"

AI:

Summary:
Brand-related Self: Confident trendsetters

Evaluation:
- Brand-related Self: Present, sufficient

Questions:
None needed.

Do you think the brand is performing well on this dimension, or do you see potential for improvement?

Does this work for you?
Jan 28, 01:05 AM
Agent is waiting...
App Preview

AUDIT DIMENSION: Prototypical User

TYPE: SINGLE ELEMENT (no subcategories or options)

Definition: The idealized image of who customers IMAGINE typically buys this brand — not who actually buys it.

Why it matters:
- Customers often want to be like the "typical buyer" they imagine
- An appealing prototypical user makes the brand attractive
- An unappealing or absent image weakens brand identity

NOT ABOUT:
- Actual customers or demographics
- Average buyer statistics
- How the product is used

---

EXAMPLES

Unclear:
- "Our customers are young people"
- "Professionals buy our products"
- "Health-conscious consumers"

Sufficient:
- "The cool, urban creative type"
- "Successful entrepreneurs who value quality"
- "Stylish, confident women in their 30s"

Clear:
- "The image is a young, ambitious professional who drives a nice car, wears designer clothes, and is seen at trendy restaurants — aspirational but relatable"

---

CLARIFYING QUESTIONS

If unclear:
"What kind of person do customers IMAGINE typically buys this brand — not who actually buys, but the idealized image?"

If user describes actual customers:
"That sounds like your real customer base. But what IMAGE does the brand project about its typical buyer — the aspirational figure customers want to be like?"

If not present:
"Does the brand have a clear image of its 'typical buyer' that customers find appealing? Or is this not defined?"

---

RECOGNITION RULE
If user describes demographics or actual buyers, gently redirect to the IMAGINED/IDEALIZED user image.

TASK
Identify if a prototypical user image exists. Assess if it's aspirational and specific, or vague/missing. Follow global PHASE 1/PHASE 2 process.

AUDIT DIMENSION: Brand Authority

TYPE: OPTIONS (brands typically focus on one, sometimes more)

Definition: Whether the brand is perceived as a trusted expert within a clearly defined domain.

OPTIONS (at least one required):

1) Category Authority — expertise in a product/service type
- Unclear: "food", "consulting", "products"
- Sufficient: "Vietnamese food", "tax consulting", "outdoor furniture"

2) Occasion Authority — expertise for a specific situation
- Unclear: "special moments", "when needed"
- Sufficient: "weddings", "business travel", "emergency repairs"

3) Competence Authority — expertise in a skill/method
- Unclear: "quality", "being good"
- Sufficient: "sustainable production", "handcrafted methods", "fast delivery"

TASK
1. If user provides recognizable answer → mark SUFFICIENT, capture in summary
2. Ask ONE clarification only if truly vague (e.g., just "food")
3. Once one option is sufficient, ask: "Is this the brand's main expertise, or does it also have strength in [other options in plain words]?"

AUDIT DIMENSION: Brand Vision

TYPE: SUBCATEGORIES (brands typically have all three)

1) Vision
Definition: Long-term strategic goals for the business
- Sufficient: "We want to become the biggest in the country"
- Clear: "We want to become #1 in sales volume in Germany by 2030"
- Clarifying question: "What does 'biggest' mean — sales, outlets, market share?"
- Missing question: "Does the brand have a long-term business goal or ambition?"

2) Mission
Definition: How the brand improves customers' lives through a distinctive principle
- Sufficient: "We help small businesses grow"
- Clear: "We help independent restaurants increase profitability through affordable marketing tools"
- Clarifying question: "Which customers? What specific benefit?"
- Missing question: "Does the brand have a mission — how it improves customers' lives?"

3) Purpose
Definition: Higher-order reason for existence beyond company and customer (societal/environmental)
- Sufficient: "We care about sustainability"
- Clear: "We exist to eliminate plastic waste in the fashion industry"
- Clarifying question: "What specific societal or environmental cause?"
- Missing question: "Does the brand have a higher purpose beyond profit and customers?"

TASK
Assess input against all three subcategories. Ask about ALL missing ones in the same response.